We already use the sample mean to estimate a population mean without asking whether it is any good. This lesson asks. Several different rules can be applied to the same sample, and they can differ in whether they are right on average, how much they scatter, whether they settle down as the sample grows, and whether they waste information. Those four questions give the vocabulary of every estimation question in the exams.
Ashanagar is an invented district. The statistics lessons use it for every worked example, so you meet the same households again as the ideas build: first as a list of numbers, then as a spread, then as a population to sample from.
It has 60 households, each with a monthly income in rupees. Unless a page says otherwise, those 60 are the whole population, and a “sample” means a few of them drawn at random. Where a page needs two variables, it uses a smaller set of 12 households with the head’s years of schooling beside income.
The figures are illustrative, made up once and fixed. They are not official statistics.
An estimator is a rule for turning a sample into a guess at a parameter: a sample statistic used to estimate a population parameter (Hyderabad 2015). The sample mean is an estimator of μ. The sample median is another. An estimate is the number the rule gives for one particular sample. The distinction is the one from Lesson 2 in new clothes: the estimator is a random variable with a sampling distribution, and the estimate is one draw from it.
Since several rules are available for the same parameter, we need ways to compare them. Each question below is about the sampling distribution of the estimator: where it is centred, how wide it is, and what happens as n grows. The lab at the heart of this lesson has five rival estimators of Ashanagar’s mean income. Keep it in mind as you read.
The bias of an estimator is the distance between the centre of its sampling distribution and the true value. An estimator is unbiased if that distance is zero: its expected value is the parameter.
Lesson 2 showed that the sample mean is unbiased: E(X̄) = μ whatever the population. So is the single first observation, E(X₁) = μ, which is a warning that unbiasedness is a weak property. A rule that ignores nine-tenths of the data is unbiased and useless, as the lab will show.
Dividing the sum of squared deviations by n gives a variance estimator that is too small on average: its expected value is (n − 1)/n times σ². Dividing by n − 1 removes the bias, which is why S² uses n − 1 (Module 1, Lesson 4). Take n = 10 and σ² = 50: the ÷ n version averages 45, a bias of −5, and the ÷ (n − 1) version averages 50.
Now the opening question. S² is unbiased for σ². Is S = √S² unbiased for σ? No. The square root is a curved function, and for a curved function the average of the root is not the root of the average. By Jensen’s inequality E(S) is strictly less than √E(S²) = σ, so S is biased downwards. The size can be large in small samples: for n = 2 from a normal population, S is |X₁ − X₂| ÷ √2, and E(S) = √(2/π) σ = 0.80σ, a bias of 20%. The bias fades as n grows. Unbiasedness does not survive a non-linear transformation.
Expectation of a sum is the sum of expectations, whether or not the draws are independent. Nothing else is needed.
Insert μ in each deviation and use the identity from the spread lesson, where the cross term vanishes because deviations from X̄ add to zero:
Each (Xi − μ)² averages σ², so the first piece averages nσ². The second is n times the variance of X̄, which the standard error derivation gave as σ² ÷ n, so it averages n × σ² ÷ n = σ².
Dividing by n leaves a bias of −σ² ÷ n: for n = 5 the average estimate is 80% of σ², and 4 ÷ 5 = 0.8 is the factor the simulation in the spread lesson showed. The bias is real but fades as n grows, so the version with n is biased and still consistent.
No. For a normal population Σ(X − X̄)² ÷ σ² follows a chi-square distribution with n − 1 degrees of freedom, whose variance is 2(n − 1). So the estimate Σ(X − X̄)² ÷ c has variance 2(n − 1)σ⁴ ÷ c² and bias ((n − 1) ÷ c − 1)σ². Larger c shrinks the variance faster than it grows the bias, up to c = n + 1.
Two unbiased estimators can still differ hugely in how far they stray in any one sample. Spread is the second property, measured by the variance of the estimator, whose square root is its standard error. Combining bias and spread gives a single score, the mean squared error: the average squared distance from the truth.
An estimator with a small bias and a small variance can beat an unbiased one with a large variance. Bias and variance trade against each other, and a good estimator is one with small total error, not necessarily zero bias. Use the lab. Each estimator is tried on 2,000 samples of Ashanagar households, and the readouts split its error into the bias squared and the variance. Try each estimator at n = 5, then at n = 160, and read the table underneath.
| Sample mean: as n grows | n = 5 | n = 20 | n = 80 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bias | +0.27 | −0.01 | −0 |
| Spread | 5.92 | 2.99 | 1.47 |
| Mean squared error | 35.1 | 8.9 | 2.2 |
Right on average and its spread falls as 1/√n. Unbiased and consistent: the estimator the whole module leans on.
The miss of the estimator θ̂ from the truth θ can be routed through its own mean E(θ̂), which is a fixed number:
The first bracket is the wobble from sample to sample. The second is the bias, the same in every sample.
The first term averages to Var(θ̂) by definition. The last is a constant, so it stays: bias squared. In the middle, (E θ̂ − θ) is a constant and comes outside, leaving 2(Eθ̂ − θ) × E(θ̂ − Eθ̂), and the average of the wobble around its own mean is zero. So the cross term is exactly zero, and
The picture computes the error two ways for 2,000 samples: directly, as the average of (estimate − truth)², and as variance plus bias squared. The two bars are the same length for every estimator and every sample size. Switch to the sample median and the bias bar dominates, and it stays put as n grows, which is why that estimator is inconsistent for the mean.
Take the Ashanagar mean, μ = 28.78 and σ² = 178.6, with n = 5. The sample mean has no bias and variance σ² ÷ 5 = 35.7, so its MSE is 35.7. The estimator Σ X ÷ (n + 1) has bias −μ ÷ 6 = −4.80, so bias squared is 23.0, and variance nσ² ÷ (n + 1)² = 24.8, so its MSE is 47.8. Shrinking cut the variance by 10.9 and added 23.0 of squared bias, a poor bargain here. Where the variance is large compared with the squared bias, the bargain can go the other way, as it did for the variance estimators in the previous derivation.
Bias and variance describe an estimator at a fixed n. Consistency describes what happens as the sample grows: the estimates converge on the true value. Formally, for any small distance ε, the probability that the estimate is within ε of the parameter tends to 1.
In words, a consistent estimator converges upon the true value as the sample size increases (JNU 2021). That is a different claim from being right on average: a consistent estimator need not be unbiased at any finite n, and an unbiased estimator need not be consistent. The lab’s five estimators fill in the grid:
| Estimator of the mean | Unbiased? | Consistent? | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sample mean | Yes | Yes | Bias zero, variance σ²/n goes to zero. |
| First observation | Yes | No | Variance stays at σ² however large n is. |
| Sum ÷ (n + 1) | No | Yes | Bias is −μ/(n + 1), which vanishes, and so does the variance. |
| Sample median | No | No, for the mean | Converges to the population median, a different number in a skewed population. |
| Midrange | No | No | The extremes keep moving outwards, so the bias grows with n. |
A practical shortcut covers most cases: if an estimator’s bias and its variance both go to zero as n grows, its mean squared error goes to zero and it is consistent. This is a sufficient condition, not a definition, and it is the reason the sample mean, the sample proportion and S² are all consistent. The law of large numbers of Lesson 3 is the statement that the sample mean is consistent. Consistency also survives continuous transformations, which is why S is consistent for σ although it is biased (GATE 2021): the opening question’s answer is biased and consistent.
Among unbiased estimators of the same parameter, the one with the smallest variance is the most precise, and is called efficient (Hyderabad 2019: if Var(Tₙ) is minimum among the given class of estimators, Tₙ is efficient). For normal data the sample mean beats the sample median: the median’s variance is about π/2, roughly 1.57 times larger, so it needs about 57% more data for the same precision.
Efficiency also answers a practical question. Two independent unbiased estimators of the same parameter, with different precision, are available. How should they be combined? Any weighted average with weights adding to 1 is unbiased, so the choice is made on variance alone, and the answer is to weight each estimator by the inverse of its variance.
The last property is about information. A statistic is sufficient if it contains all the information the sample holds about the parameter (Hyderabad 2011, Hyderabad 2020): once you know it, the rest of the sample adds nothing. In a sample of coin tosses, the number of heads is sufficient for the probability of heads: the order of the heads and tails tells you nothing more about the coin. The sample mean is sufficient for the mean of a normal population, and the sample maximum is sufficient for the upper limit of a uniform one. It does not contain all information needed to solve the research problem, nor all information about the population, only everything in the sample about the parameter.
Sufficiency is a separate property from the others. A sufficient statistic may be biased and need not be consistent, so sufficiency does not guarantee either. Whether a given statistic is sufficient is settled by the factorisation theorem of the next lesson.
Definitions and one-step calculations. Most CUET and Hyderabad questions sit here.
Joint tables, standard errors and statement questions, up to JNU and IIT JAM level.
This topic’s hardest questions, from the DSE entrance, are worked through in Lesson 13: Estimation and confidence intervals.
These are questions from the TestStop bank. A free account answers 10 a day, each with its worked solution; All-Access opens every set with no daily limit.