Statistics is how economics checks itself against the data. This module teaches the ground floor, from what kind of number you are holding to variance, correlation and index numbers, using one invented district to run every example through. Every idea comes with a diagram you can move, and every lesson ends on real past-paper questions: 244 so far, from CUET, JNU, IIT JAM, Hyderabad and UGC NET.
The running example is Ashanagar, an invented district whose sixty households have monthly incomes you can inspect, regroup and drag around. All of its figures are illustrative. The lessons say so each time, and none of it is presented as official data.
What kind of data you have, where it is centred, how far it spreads and which way it leans.
How two variables move together, and the straight line that summarises the pattern.
Index numbers: how prices, quantities and wages are compared across years.
Successive percentage changes, the compound annual growth rate and doubling time.
The Delhi School's harder questions on all of the above.
One question from each lesson that is ready. Your first wrong answer tells you where to begin; get them all and go straight to the cheat sheet.
Which scale of measurement lets you say that one value is twice another?
The commonest mistake in this whole topic is reaching for the arithmetic mean when another average is the right one. Six situations, five averages.
The formula, when to use it, and the trap examiners set on it. Each row links to the lesson that teaches it. Rows are added as lessons are published.
| Measure | Formula | Use it for | The trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arithmetic mean | Symmetric numerical data; the default | Pulled by extreme values. Never average two means without weights. | |
| Median | Skewed data, ordinal data, open-ended classes | Even n: average the two middle values. Raw quartiles use (n + 1)/4, grouped use N/4. | |
| Mode | Nominal data; the commonest size | Can be absent or multiple. For continuous data group first. | |
| Weighted mean | Groups of different sizes; sector shares | Weights must reflect size, not just be present. | |
| Geometric mean | Ratios, price relatives and growth factors | Zero if any value is zero. Always at most the arithmetic mean. | |
| Harmonic mean | Rates when the numerator is fixed (equal distance, equal spending) | Not defined with a zero. Always at most the geometric mean. | |
| Compound growth rate (CAGR) | The one steady rate that gives the same end value | Never above the arithmetic average of the yearly rates. A 20% fall needs a 25% rise. | |
| Range, QD | Quick spread; QD for outliers and open classes | The range uses two values only. Same range can hide very different variances. | |
| Variance, SD | The standard measure of spread | Sample: divide by n − 1. Add k: no change. Multiply by c: SD × |c|, variance × c². | |
| Coefficient of variation | Comparing spread across different units or levels | Unchanged by multiplying, changed by adding. Needs a ratio scale. | |
| z-score | Comparing values from different distributions | Standardised data have mean 0 and SD 1. | |
| Skewness | Direction and size of the lean, free of units | Long right tail is positive, with mean > median > mode. Mode = 3 Median − 2 Mean is for moderate skew only. | |
| Bowley's coefficient | Open-ended classes and outliers | Always between −1 and +1. Ignores the tails. | |
| Kurtosis | Tail weight; 3 is the normal curve | The excess is β₂ − 3. Skewness and kurtosis are separate properties. | |
| Covariance | Direction of joint movement; the building block of r | Unbounded, with units. Var(X + Y) = Var X + Var Y + 2 Cov. | |
| Pearson's r | Strength of a linear association | Between −1 and +1; unchanged by origin and positive scale; 0 is not independence; not causation. | |
| Spearman's rank correlation | Ranks and ordinal data | Average the ranks of tied values. | |
| Regression line | Predicting y from x; the slope is the change in y per unit of x | b_yx b_xy = r². The two lines cross at the means. Shifting x or y leaves the slope alone. | |
| R-squared | The share of the variation in y that the line explains | Square r first: r = 0.8 explains 64%. Not comparable across different dependent variables. | |
| Laspeyres and Paasche | Price indices with base-year and current-year quantities as weights | Laspeyres usually overstates, Paasche understates. Fisher is their geometric mean and passes both reversal tests. | |
| Real value | Turning rupees of different years into the same purchasing power | An index of 234.7 is a 134.7% rise. Contribution to inflation = weight × the group's own change. |
JNU sets the most: combined means, shifts and scales, the coefficient of variation, and the properties of the correlation coefficient. Hyderabad asks properties and definitions, and loves AM, GM and HM. CUET gives short computations and matching lists. The Delhi School’s harder questions are collected in Lesson 10.
Definitions, one-step arithmetic and which-measure questions. Most CUET and Hyderabad questions sit here.
Grouped data, combined means, effects of shifting and scaling, and statement questions, up to JNU level.
The Delhi School of Economics' harder questions, collected in the last lesson.
These are questions from the TestStop bank. A free account answers 10 a day, each with its worked solution; All-Access opens every set with no daily limit.
The mean is the sum divided by the count, the balance point of the data. The median is the middle value once the data are sorted. The mode is the most frequent value. For symmetric data they are close together. For skewed data such as incomes the mean is pulled towards the long tail, so the median is the better description of a typical household, and the mode is the only average that works for categories such as religion or occupation.
Deviations in a sample are measured from the sample's own mean, which is the point that makes them as small as possible, so they come out smaller on average than deviations from the true population mean. Dividing by n therefore underestimates the population variance by a factor of (n − 1)/n. Dividing by n − 1 removes the bias. Equivalently, the deviations from the sample mean add to zero, so only n − 1 of them are free.
When the quantities multiply: growth rates, inflation over several years, investment returns. Convert each rate to a growth factor (1 plus the rate), take the geometric mean of the factors and subtract 1 to get the compound annual growth rate. The arithmetic average of growth rates always overstates the compound rate unless every year's rate is the same.
For rates such as speed or price per unit when the same amount of the numerator is used each time: equal distances at different speeds, or equal spending at different prices. A car that drives 40 km/h out and 60 km/h back over the same road averages 48 km/h for the round trip, which is the harmonic mean, not 50.
It divides the standard deviation by the mean, so it measures spread as a share of the average and has no units. It lets you compare the variability of two series measured in different units or at very different levels, for example the price of wheat and the price of rice. It only makes sense for data on a ratio scale, with a true zero.
They are the four scales of measurement. Nominal data are labels with no order (religion, state). Ordinal data have an order but unmeasured gaps (grades, ranks). Interval data have meaningful differences but no true zero (temperature in Celsius, the calendar year). Ratio data have a true zero, so ratios are meaningful (income, price, a count). The scale decides which averages and measures of spread are allowed.
The population is every unit you want to know about, for example all households in a district. A sample is the part of it you actually observe. A number describing the population is a parameter (mean μ, standard deviation σ); a number computed from the sample is a statistic (x̄, s) and is your estimate of the parameter.
Skewness describes which way a distribution leans. If the long tail runs to the right it is positively skewed and the mean is pulled above the median and mode, so mean > median > mode. If the long tail runs to the left it is negatively skewed and the order reverses. Incomes, house prices and firm sizes are typically positively skewed. Karl Pearson's coefficient, (mean − mode) ÷ standard deviation, puts a number on it.
No. Pearson's correlation only measures straight-line association. If X takes the values −1, 0 and 1 with equal probability and Y = X², then Y is completely determined by X, yet the correlation between them is zero. Independent variables are always uncorrelated, but uncorrelated variables need not be independent. A correlation, however strong, also does not show that one variable causes the other.
R² is the share of the total variation in the dependent variable that the fitted line explains: 1 minus the residual sum of squares over the total sum of squares. In a simple regression with an intercept it equals the square of the correlation coefficient, so a correlation of 0.8 gives an R² of 0.64. It describes how closely the points hug the line. It does not show that x causes y, and it is not comparable between models with different dependent variables.
The Laspeyres index prices the base-year basket at current prices, as if households kept buying the same goods. In practice they buy less of what became dearer and more of what became relatively cheap, so pricing the old basket overstates the rise in the cost of living. The Paasche index prices the current basket, which has already shifted toward the cheaper goods, so it understates it. Fisher's ideal index, the geometric mean of the two, lies between them.