Last lesson ended with a promise: the sample mean has a distribution, centred on the truth, whose spread shrinks as the sample grows. This lesson puts numbers on that spread, shows why the distribution turns into a bell whatever the population looks like, and turns the question around: how many households must you visit to be within a given distance of the truth?
Ashanagar is an invented district. The statistics lessons use it for every worked example, so you meet the same households again as the ideas build: first as a list of numbers, then as a spread, then as a population to sample from.
It has 60 households, each with a monthly income in rupees. Unless a page says otherwise, those 60 are the whole population, and a “sample” means a few of them drawn at random. Where a page needs two variables, it uses a smaller set of 12 households with the head’s years of schooling beside income.
The figures are illustrative, made up once and fixed. They are not official statistics.
Last lesson, the six-household population produced fifteen possible sample means, and their spread told us how much a single sample could miss by. That spread has a name. The standard error of a statistic is the standard deviation of its sampling distribution: how much the statistic typically differs from the thing it estimates, from one sample to the next.
For the sample mean the answer is short, and it is the single most useful formula in this module.
A random sample of 25 from a population with σ = 10 has a standard error of 10 ÷ √25 = 2 (CUET 2023). The standard error is in the same units as the data, and it is not the standard deviation of the population (which would be 10) or of the sample. It says how precisely the sample mean pins down μ.
The square root is the whole story. The error falls with √n, not with n, so a sample four times as large has only half the error. That is exactly the opening question: 20 at n = 25 and 10 at n = 100 is a halving for a quadrupling, and σ ÷ 5 = 20 gives σ = 100. We will solve it properly at the end.
Drag the sample size in the lab. The solid curve is σ ÷ √n for the sixty Ashanagar incomes. It falls steeply at first and flattens: the tenth household buys a lot of precision and the fiftieth buys very little. The dashed curve is the same quantity when the units are not put back, which we met last lesson, and it falls all the way to zero when the sample is the whole population. A census has no sampling error.
To halve the error you would need 36 households, four times as many. Going from 9 to 18 cuts it only to 71% of what it was.
A proportion is a mean of zeros and ones. If a unit is a success with probability p, its standard deviation is √(p(1 − p)), so the sample proportion p̂ has
Fair coin, 25 tosses: the standard deviation of the proportion of heads is √(0.5 × 0.5 ÷ 25) = √0.01 = 0.1 (JNU 2016). A survey of 400 likely voters in which 215 back the ruling party has p̂ = 0.5375, and, since p is unknown, the standard error is estimated with p̂ in its place: √(0.5375 × 0.4625 ÷ 400) = 0.025 (DSE 2007). The expression p(1 − p) is largest at p = 0.5, so a proportion near one half is the hardest to pin down, a fact we will use to plan sample sizes.
When two independent samples are compared, their variances add. For the difference of two sample proportions drawn without replacement from populations of sizes N₁ and N₂, the standard deviation is the square root of the sum of two corrected variances (IIT JAM 2022):
Two details are exam favourites. The variances are added, never subtracted, even for a difference, because uncertainty from two independent samples piles up. And each sample gets its own correction factor. When the populations are large, the factors are 1 and the formula reduces to the familiar √(p₁q₁/n₁ + p₂q₂/n₂).
Everything about the mean now reduces to two questions: what is the variance of a sum, and what does dividing by n do to a variance?
From the rule for combinations in the correlation lesson, Var(aX + bY) = a²σX² + b²σY² + 2ab Cov(X, Y). Independent draws have Cov = 0, so the cross terms vanish, and with a = b = 1 and n terms
The sum gets more spread out as draws are added, but only like √n, because the variance grows like n. The left picture shows it. The Ashanagar incomes have σ² = 178.6, so four draws added together have a variance near 4 × 178.6 = 714.6.
Multiply every value by a constant c and every deviation from the mean is multiplied by c, so every squared deviation by c². Hence Var(cY) = c²Var(Y). With c = 1 ÷ n:
For four draws, 178.6 ÷ 4 = 44.7, a standard error of 6.68 (₹ thousand) against a population standard deviation of 13.37.
The variance falls like 1 ÷ n, so the standard error falls like 1 ÷ √n. To halve the error you need four times the sample, to cut it to a tenth you need a hundred times. This is the fact behind DSE 2018: quadrupling the sample size only halved the standard error. It is also why precision gets expensive: the tenth household buys a lot, the fiftieth buys little.
Draw n households from a population of N without putting any back, and the draws are linked: if the first household is rich, the others are a little less likely to be. Their covariance is the same for every pair, call it c. Take all N households. Their total is fixed, so its variance is zero, and the variance formula gives
Now add n draws, which have n variances and n(n − 1) ordered pairs of covariances:
That is the finite population correction of the sampling lesson, derived. With N = 6 and n = 2 the covariance is −σ² ÷ 5 and the factor is (6 − 2) ÷ (6 − 1) = 0.8. Take n = N and it is 0: a census has no sampling error.
Two theorems describe what happens to the sample mean as n grows. They are often confused, and examiners put them side by side.
The law of large numbers says the sample mean gets closer to μ. Since its standard error σ/√n shrinks to zero, X̄ converges to the population mean: it is a consistent estimator of μ. That is a statement about where X̄ ends up, and says nothing about its shape.
The central limit theorem says something much stronger about the shape. Take independent draws from any population with a finite mean μ and variance σ². Standardise the sample mean by subtracting μ and dividing by its standard error. As n grows, the distribution of the result approaches the standard normal.
The lab draws two thousand samples from a population and plots their means. None of the four populations is bell-shaped: Ashanagar’s incomes lean right, the lottery ticket is almost all zeros with a rare ₹100, the two camps have two peaks, and a die is flat. Slide n upwards and watch the bars settle onto the dashed normal curve with mean μ and standard deviation σ/√n.
With n = 1 each “mean” is a single draw, so the bars simply copy the population. Increase n.
Four things to look for as you move the slider:
Several past questions test exactly this wording. A sample mean of independent trials with success probability p approximates a normal distribution with mean p; it does not have one (DSE 2019), because a mean of zeros and ones takes finitely many values. The assertion that the distribution of the sample mean tends to normal for very large n has the central limit theorem as its correct reason (UGC NET 2023). IIT JAM 2024 asks which of four statements about a sample from a distribution with mean μ and non-zero variance σ² are correct, and three are: the standard deviation of the sample mean is σ/√n, the standardised sum tends to a standard normal, and the sample mean is a consistent estimator of μ. The fourth, that (n − 1)S²/σ² follows a chi-square distribution, is true only when the data are normal.
Independent draws from a population with a finite variance, and a large n. It does not need the population to be normal. If the population is normal, the sample mean is exactly normal for every n, however small, and the theorem is not needed.
From the standard error derivation, k independent draws with mean μ and variance σ² have a sum with mean kμ and variance kσ². Standardise: Zk = (Sk − kμ) ÷ (σ√k). Whatever the population, Zk has mean 0 and variance 1. Centre and spread are therefore fixed, and the only open question is the shape.
If S has probabilities P(S = s) and one more independent draw X is added, the new sum equals t in several ways: S = s and X = t − s, for every s. So
This operation is called convolution. For one fair die, each total from 1 to 6 has probability 1 ÷ 6. For two dice, total 7 arises in 6 ways and total 2 in one way, giving the triangle. Each pass spreads the mass out and rounds off whatever corner was there.
Choose the fair die and press the slider up. One die has a flat top, and the largest gap between its cumulative probabilities and the normal curve is 0.054. Two dice: 0.016. Ten dice: 0.003. Thirty: 0.001. Pick the very lopsided die and the same thing happens more slowly, from 0.254 at one draw to 0.036 at thirty. The shape forgets where it started, and the speed of forgetting depends on how skewed the start was.
Suppose the standardised sums settle on some limiting shape F. Then the sum of 2k draws is two independent sums of k draws added, and its standardised form is Z2k = (Zk + Zk′) ÷ √2. In the limit F must therefore be a shape that reproduces itself when two independent copies are added and divided by √2. The normal curve does exactly that: if Z and Z′ are independent standard normals, then (Z + Z′) ÷ √2 has variance (1 + 1) ÷ 2 = 1 and is again normal, because a sum of independent normals is normal. A classical theorem says it is the only shape with finite variance that survives this operation.
It says the shape of the sum or the mean approaches the bell as k grows, for any population with a finite variance. It does not say how fast, and the picture shows that the speed depends on the starting shape. It also does not say the data themselves become normal: a single die stays a die, and only sums and means smooth out. A proof needs more machinery (moment generating functions or characteristic functions), and what this derivation gives is the reason the limit is the normal curve and not another one.
Many textbooks say “n ≥ 30 is large”. As a rule of thumb for moderately skewed data it is fine. As a statement about the theorem it is wrong: the central limit theorem is a statement about the limit, and prescribes no minimum sample size (DSE 2011). The lab shows why. The right n depends on how far the population is from symmetric.
For the same reason, a bigger sample is better for a reason that is not the central limit theorem. A sample of 30 gives a more precise estimate of average height than a sample of 20 because its standard error is smaller, not because 20 is too few for a theorem to work and not because the smaller sample is more “biased” (DSE 2011). Both samples are unbiased if they are drawn at random. They differ in precision.
So far n was given and the error was the answer. Planning a survey reverses it: you decide how close you want to be, and the formula tells you the cost. If you want the sample mean to be within a margin E of μ with probability 95%, then 1.96 standard errors must not exceed E. Solving for n:
For a proportion the standard deviation is not known in advance, but it can never exceed 0.5, since p(1 − p) peaks at 0.25. Using p = 0.5 gives a worst-case sample size that is safe whatever the true proportion turns out to be.
For a margin of error of 3 percentage points at 95% confidence, the worst case is 1.96² × 0.25 ÷ 0.03² = 1,067.1, so 1,068 respondents. This is why opinion polls so often sample about a thousand people. Notice what is missing: the size of the population. A sample of 1,068 gives the same margin whether the electorate is a lakh or a billion, until the sample becomes a sizeable part of the population and the correction applies. Halving the margin to 1.5 points costs four times as many people, 4,269, which is the square root law again.
Definitions and one-step calculations. Most CUET and Hyderabad questions sit here.
Joint tables, standard errors and statement questions, up to JNU and IIT JAM level.
This topic’s hardest questions, from the DSE entrance, are worked through in Lesson 13: Sampling and the standard error.
These are questions from the TestStop bank. A free account answers 10 a day, each with its worked solution; All-Access opens every set with no daily limit.