How does a person decide what to buy, and what does that tell us about demand? This module answers with one consumer, built up a step at a time: what a ranking of bundles must satisfy, how a utility number stands for it, what she can afford, and what she picks. Every lesson has something to move and ends on real past-paper questions, 310 in all.
The order is the logic of the subject. Preferences come first, then what she can afford, then the choice that puts the two together. Demand is that choice traced out as a price or income changes, and the later lessons ask what lies underneath it: how much of a price effect is substitution, and what a price change is worth in money.
Once you reach Lesson 14 there is a Consumer Workbench: choose tastes and prices and it computes demand, the expenditure function, elasticities, both decompositions of a price change and the money measures at once, and checks the identities between them.
What a ranking must satisfy, how a number can stand for it, and the special kinds of taste the papers ask about.
The budget line, the best affordable bundle, corners, taxes and grants, and the same problem for work and for saving.
The demand curve, elasticity and revenue, Engel curves and the type of good.
Income and substitution effects, revealed preference, the expenditure function, compensating variation and the properties of demand.
The Delhi School's consumer questions, by technique.
One question from each lesson that is ready. Your first wrong answer tells you where to begin; get them all and go straight to the cheat sheet.
A consumer prefers A to B, B to C and C to A. Which assumption fails?
What each idea says, what to use it for, and the trap examiners set on it.
JNU and Hyderabad set the most consumer-theory questions, many of them numerical: an optimum for a Cobb–Douglas or quasi-linear taste, the effect of a tax. CUET and UGC NET ask definitions and statements to judge. JAM and GATE include unusual tastes such as max, shifted and mixed utilities. The Delhi School’s questions, which are the hardest, are gathered in Lesson 17 and grouped by technique.
Definitions and one-step calculations: the shape of a curve, a budget line, an optimum for Cobb–Douglas tastes. Most CUET, UGC NET, Hyderabad and early JNU questions sit here.
Statements to judge, matching lists, and demands to compute with unusual tastes, up to JAM, GATE and JNU level.
These are questions from the TestStop bank. A free account answers 10 a day, each with its worked solution; All-Access opens every set with no daily limit.
The set of bundles of two goods that a consumer likes equally well. Curves further from the origin are better, they never cross, and with two goods she likes they slope down because more of one good must be traded for less of the other to stay equally well off.
The rate at which a consumer will give up one good for another and stay equally well off: MU of x divided by MU of y, which is also minus the slope of her indifference curve. It does not change when the utility function is replaced by an increasing transformation of itself.
With x on the horizontal axis it is −p_x/p_y. The size of the slope is the opportunity cost of x: the units of y she must give up to buy one more unit of x.
Set the marginal rate of substitution equal to the price ratio, so that the indifference curve just touches the budget line, and then use the budget equation to fix the scale. For u = x^a y^(1−a) this gives x = a·m/p_x and y = (1−a)·m/p_y. For straight-line, L-shaped or non-convex tastes, compare the corner and kink candidates instead.
An optimum where the consumer buys only one good. It happens with perfect substitutes when one good gives more utility per rupee, with a good she dislikes, with tastes whose curves bow away from the origin, and with quasi-linear tastes when the interior quantity costs more than her income. At a corner the MRS does not equal the price ratio.
Because any increasing transformation of a utility function ranks the bundles in exactly the same order. Only the order of the numbers is meaningful, not their size, differences or ratios, which is why the MRS, indifference curves and demand are unaffected by the transformation but marginal utility is not.
A change in the price of the good itself moves the consumer along her demand curve and changes the quantity demanded. A change in anything else that affects her choice, such as income, the price of a substitute or complement, tastes or the number of buyers, shifts the whole curve and changes demand.
Compare the size of the price elasticity with 1. If it is above 1 the quantity changes by a larger percentage than the price, so a price cut raises revenue. If it is below 1 a price cut lowers revenue. At exactly 1 revenue does not change. On a straight-line demand curve the elasticity falls from infinity at the top to zero at the bottom and equals 1 at the midpoint.
They are named by the income elasticity of demand. An inferior good has a negative one, so she buys less as her income rises. A normal good has a positive one: a necessity if it is between 0 and 1, so its share of her budget falls as she gets richer, and a luxury if it is above 1, so its share rises.
It splits the total change in the quantity demanded when a price changes into a substitution effect and an income effect: the derivative of demand with respect to its own price equals the derivative of Hicksian (compensated) demand minus the quantity times the derivative of demand with respect to income. The substitution term is never positive; the income term is positive for an inferior good.
Marshallian demand is the quantity chosen at given prices and income. Hicksian (compensated) demand is the quantity that minimises spending to reach a given utility. They are the same bundle at the starting point and differ elsewhere by the income effect: for a normal good the Hicksian curve is the steeper.
Two exact money measures of the welfare effect of a price change. The compensating variation is the change in income, at the new prices, that restores the old utility. The equivalent variation is the change in income, at the old prices, that gives the new utility. For a price fall of a normal good the equivalent variation is the larger in size and the compensating variation the smaller, with the change in consumer surplus between them.
Homothetic preferences have a marginal rate of substitution that depends only on the ratio of the goods, so the income expansion path is a straight line from the origin. Quasi-linear preferences, u = g(x) + y, have indifference curves that are vertical translates of one another and a demand for x that does not depend on income once she is buying both goods.
Every answer key in the practice sets was worked by hand and, where it is a calculation, recomputed by a script from the model behind the labs, before the question was placed. The exercises in each lesson are recomputed the same way. A question is left out when its key or its stored text cannot be defended. Those are listed here, with the reason, so that you can tell a hard question from a broken one.