Why are some countries rich, and why do their incomes change at such different speeds? Growth theory is the economist’s answer, built one model at a time, each fixing what the last got wrong. This module starts from the facts, builds every model the exams ask, and ends with the evidence and the history behind each idea. Every lesson can be read on its own, and every one ends on real past-paper questions: 135 so far.
The order is the order the ideas arrived in, because each model is a response to the one before. Harrod and Domar found that growth could be a knife edge; Solow replaced the knife edge with a steady state; the steady state could not explain why growth goes on, so endogenous growth theory put technical progress inside the model. Read in order and the field is a story. Read singly and each lesson still teaches one model fully.
What is measured, how growth compounds, how output is produced, and how much of growth the inputs explain.
Harrod and Domar's knife edge, Solow's steady state, the golden rule, and whether poor countries catch up.
Where the saving rate comes from: households who plan ahead.
Why growth continues: constant returns to capital, human capital and ideas.
Growth as distribution and class, and the models against East Asia, India and institutions.
The Delhi School's harder questions on growth.
One question from each lesson that is ready. Your first wrong answer tells you where to begin; get them all and go straight to the cheat sheet.
A country's real GDP grows 6% a year and its population 2%. Real GDP per head grows by about
Each entry is the paper the idea first appeared in, with its year, and links to the lesson that teaches it once that lesson is published. Dates were checked against the papers’ own bibliographic records.
Growth theory advanced by argument. Six of them, each with the lesson where it is settled, or left open.
The formula, what it is for, and the trap examiners set on it. Each row links to the lesson that teaches it.
| Idea | Formula | Use it for | The trap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Growth rate | How fast real output is rising | Use real GDP. Per head: growth of output minus growth of population, approximately. | |
| Doubling time | How long steady growth takes to double a level | The rate goes in as a percentage: 70 ÷ 3, not 70 ÷ 0.03. | |
| Cobb–Douglas | The workhorse production function; exponents are factor shares | Constant returns only if the exponents sum to one. | |
| Intensive form | Output per worker as a function of capital per worker | Needs constant returns to scale. | |
| Growth accounting | The Solow residual: growth not explained by inputs | Shares weight the growth rates. The residual is a measure of ignorance, not of technology alone. | |
| Harrod–Domar | Warranted growth from saving and the capital–output ratio | The warranted path is a knife edge. Warranted ≠ actual ≠ natural. | |
| Solow steady state | Where capital per worker stops changing | Saving changes the level of income, not its long-run growth rate. | |
| Speed of convergence | How fast the gap to the steady state closes | Independent of the saving rate. About 5% a year in the basic model, about 2% in the data. | |
| Golden rule | The saving rate that maximises steady-state consumption | Above it the economy is dynamically inefficient; below it, reaching it costs consumption now. | |
| β-convergence | Regression slope of growth on initial log income, over T years | Absolute needs identical parameters; conditional needs controls. β is not σ. | |
| Euler equation | Optimal consumption growth in the Ramsey model | The steady state is f′(k) = δ + ρ, not the golden rule f′(k) = n + δ. | |
| AK model | Growth from inside the model, with constant returns to broad capital | No steady state and no convergence; saving changes the growth rate. | |
| Romer and Jones | Growth from the production of ideas | Only at φ = 1 can policy change the long-run growth rate. | |
| Kaldor and Pasinetti | Distribution from saving and growth | Workers' saving does not enter the Pasinetti profit rate. Golden age is not golden rule. | |
| Crude ICOR | Reading a country's growth through Harrod–Domar | A rough ratio: it mixes capital deepening, widening and productivity. | |
| Full depreciation | Delhi School one-period economies | Initial capital does not matter for the steady state. |
Hyderabad and UGC NET ask which model says what: assumptions, warranted and natural rates, and the order of the theories. JNU and IIT JAM ask for steady-state algebra and growth accounting. CUET gives short calculations and matching lists. The Delhi School’s harder questions are collected in the last lesson, 35 of them grouped by technique.
Definitions, one-step arithmetic and which-model questions. Most CUET and Hyderabad questions sit here.
Growth accounting, steady-state algebra, statement questions and matching, up to JNU, IIT JAM and UGC NET level.
Every Delhi School entrance question above Easy that we could verify, from the steady state to labour-market growth models, grouped by technique in Lesson 14.
These are questions from the TestStop bank. A free account answers 10 a day, each with its worked solution; All-Access opens every set with no daily limit.
Classical growth theory (Smith, Ricardo, Malthus) stressed capital accumulation, the division of labour and diminishing returns. The Harrod–Domar model (1939, 1946) made growth depend on the saving rate and the capital–output ratio. The Solow–Swan neoclassical model (1956) added substitutable inputs and diminishing returns, so that long-run growth per head comes from technical progress. Endogenous growth theory (Romer, Lucas, Aghion and Howitt, from the mid-1980s) explains technical progress inside the model. The Cambridge school (Kaldor, Joan Robinson, Pasinetti) emphasises distribution between profits and wages.
Harrod–Domar uses fixed proportions: capital and labour are used in a fixed ratio, so growth is saving divided by the capital–output ratio, and the warranted growth path is unstable, a knife edge. Solow lets capital and labour substitute, with diminishing returns to capital, so the economy converges to a steady state in which capital per worker is constant. In Solow, a higher saving rate raises the level of income but not the long-run growth rate; in Harrod–Domar it raises growth.
The Solow residual is the part of output growth not accounted for by growth in measured inputs. It is calculated as output growth minus capital's share times capital growth minus labour's share times labour growth, and is usually read as growth in total factor productivity, which includes technical progress and everything else the inputs do not capture. Solow (1957) found it accounted for most of US growth per worker.
Endogenous growth theory explains long-run growth from inside the model instead of assuming technical progress arrives from outside. In the AK model, capital has constant returns so saving raises growth permanently. In Romer's models, ideas are non-rival and researchers choose to produce them, so growth comes from the allocation of resources to research. The key difference from Solow is that policy can change the long-run growth rate.
It is the saving rate that maximises consumption per worker in the steady state. In the Cobb–Douglas Solow model it equals capital's share of income. Saving more than the golden-rule rate makes the economy dynamically inefficient: it could consume more today and in every future period by saving less.
The Solow model predicts conditional convergence: an economy grows faster the further it is below its own steady state. Absolute convergence, in which all poor countries catch up, needs identical saving rates, population growth and technology. In data for 76 countries from 1990 to 2024 there is a weak negative relationship between initial income and growth. Controlling for saving, population growth and schooling, the speed of convergence is about 2 per cent a year (Barro; Mankiw, Romer and Weil), much slower than the basic Solow model's 5 per cent.
It is the growth model in which households choose how much to save. An infinitely lived household maximises discounted lifetime utility, which gives the Euler equation ċ/c = (f′(k) − δ − ρ)/θ. Together with the capital accumulation equation it has a single saddle-point steady state, f′(k*) = δ + ρ, the modified golden rule, which lies below the golden rule because households are impatient.
Yes. Every lesson starts with a short answer to the question its title asks, restates the few things it needs from earlier lessons in a primer, and ends with a quick-answers section. The lessons are in order because later models answer the weaknesses of earlier ones, so reading them in sequence gives the fullest picture.