Skip to content
We use only essential cookies to keep you signed in and remember your preferences. See our Cookie Policy.
TestStop
MocksPracticeResourcesIndiaBlogPricing
Sign in
Questions › GATE › GATE 2023 › Q27
1 mark, −0.333Microeconomics › Budget constraint and consumer equilibrium › Demand under complements, substitutes and quasilinear utilityModerateabout 3 min

GATE 2023 Question 27: Budget constraint and consumer equilibrium

An individual is endowed with income of Rs. 142 and has the utility function U(x1,x2)=x2(x1+1)U(x_1,x_2) = x_2(x_1+1)U(x1​,x2​)=x2​(x1​+1), where x1≥0,x2≥0x_1 \ge 0, x_2 \ge 0x1​≥0,x2​≥0. The unit price of x1x_1x1​ is Rs. 2 and the unit price of x2x_2x2​ is Rs. 3. The utility maximizing bundle is

Tap an option to check your answer.

Answer and worked solution

Answer: (C)

Budget constraint: 2x1+3x2=1422x_1 + 3x_2 = 1422x1​+3x2​=142.

MU1=∂U∂x1=x2MU_1 = \dfrac{\partial U}{\partial x_1} = x_2MU1​=∂x1​∂U​=x2​, MU2=∂U∂x2=x1+1\quad MU_2 = \dfrac{\partial U}{\partial x_2} = x_1+1MU2​=∂x2​∂U​=x1​+1.

Tangency condition: MU1MU2=p1p2⇒x2x1+1=23⇒3x2=2(x1+1)=2x1+2⇒x2=2x1+23\dfrac{MU_1}{MU_2} = \dfrac{p_1}{p_2} \Rightarrow \dfrac{x_2}{x_1+1} = \dfrac{2}{3} \Rightarrow 3x_2 = 2(x_1+1) = 2x_1+2 \Rightarrow x_2 = \dfrac{2x_1+2}{3}MU2​MU1​​=p2​p1​​⇒x1​+1x2​​=32​⇒3x2​=2(x1​+1)=2x1​+2⇒x2​=32x1​+2​.

Substitute into the budget constraint:

2x1+3(2x1+23)=142⇒2x1+2x1+2=142⇒4x1=140⇒x1=352x_1 + 3\left(\frac{2x_1+2}{3}\right) = 142 \Rightarrow 2x_1 + 2x_1+2 = 142 \Rightarrow 4x_1 = 140 \Rightarrow x_1 = 352x1​+3(32x1​+2​)=142⇒2x1​+2x1​+2=142⇒4x1​=140⇒x1​=35

x2=2(35)+23=723=24x_2 = \frac{2(35)+2}{3} = \frac{72}{3} = 24x2​=32(35)+2​=372​=24

Therefore the utility-maximizing bundle is x1=35,x2=24x_1=35, x_2=24x1​=35,x2​=24, option (C).

The trap: (A) x1=35,x2=20x_1=35, x_2=20x1​=35,x2​=20

Students sometimes treat this as an ordinary Cobb-Douglas problem and apply the standard constant-expenditure-share shortcut, ignoring the '+1' shift inside the utility function — this shifted marginal utility changes the tangency condition and produces a different, incorrect x2x_2x2​ value (option A keeps the correct x1=35x_1=35x1​=35 but gets x2x_2x2​ wrong).

Plain-text version

An individual is endowed with income of Rs. 142 and has the utility function U(x₁,x₂) = x₂(x₁+1), where x₁ ≥ 0, x₂ ≥ 0. The unit price of x₁ is Rs. 2 and the unit price of x₂ is Rs. 3. The utility maximizing bundle is (A) x₁=35, x₂=20 (B) x₁=30, x₂=24 (C) x₁=35, x₂=24 (D) x₁=30, x₂=20

Also written as: An individual is endowed with income of Rs. 142 and has the utility function U(x_1,x_2) = x_2(x_1+1), where x_1 >= 0, x_2 >= 0. The unit price of x_1 is Rs. 2 and the unit price of x_2 is Rs. 3. The utility maximizing bundle is

Budget constraint and consumer equilibrium has come up 99 times in 7 exams since 2004.

What this question tests

This question is on Demand under complements, substitutes and quasilinear utility, part of Budget constraint and consumer equilibrium in Microeconomics.

Deriving demand when preferences are L-shaped, linear or quasilinear, and what that implies for income and price responses.

TestStop has 23 past-paper questions on this subtopic.

Take this paper as a timed mockMore on Demand under complements, substitutes and quasilinear utility

Question from the GATE 2023 paper. Solutions are TestStop's own. Not affiliated with or endorsed by any examination authority.