A researcher estimates Model A: and Model B: , where is study hours and is ability. in A but in B (both significant), and (significant). This suggests that
Tap an option to check your answer.
A researcher estimates Model A: and Model B: , where is study hours and is ability. in A but in B (both significant), and (significant). This suggests that
Tap an option to check your answer.
Checking your account…
A researcher estimates Model A: yᵢ=β₀+β₁Sᵢ+β₂Aᵢ+εᵢ and Model B: yᵢ=β₀+β₁Sᵢ+εᵢ, where S is study hours and A is ability. β̂₁=7.1 in A but 2.1 in B (both significant), and β̂₂=1.9 (significant). This suggests that (A) students with lower ability also spend fewer hours studying (B) students with lower ability spend more time studying (C) there is no way that students of even high ability can get more than 40 marks (D) none of the above
Also written as: A researcher estimates Model A: y_i=beta_0+beta_1S_i+beta_2A_i+epsilon_i and Model B: y_i=beta_0+beta_1S_i+epsilon_i, where S is study hours and A is ability. beta_hat_1=7.1 in A but 2.1 in B (both significant), and beta_hat_2=1.9 (significant). This suggests that
Misspecification and measurement error has come up 11 times in 4 exams since 2011.
This question is on Omitted variable bias, part of Misspecification and measurement error in Econometrics.
How leaving out a relevant variable biases the estimates, and in which direction.
TestStop has 4 past-paper questions on this subtopic; the nearest in year are below.
Question from the DSE 2015 paper. Solutions are TestStop's own. Not affiliated with or endorsed by any examination authority.