Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R. Assertion A: If a proposition P implies proposition Q, then we can say that P is a sufficient condition for Q or P Q Reason R: For proportion Q to be true it is sufficient that P is true i.e., Q is a necessary condition for P. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Tap an option to check your answer.
Checking your account…
Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R. Assertion A: If a proposition P implies proposition Q, then we can say that P is a sufficient condition for Q or P ⇒ Q Reason R: For proportion Q to be true it is sufficient that P is true i.e., Q is a necessary condition for P. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below: (A) Both A and R are correct and R is the correct explanation of A (B) Both A and R are correct but R is NOT the correct explanation of A (C) A is correct but R is not correct (D) A is not correct but R is correct
Also written as: Given below are two statements: one is labelled as Assertion A and the other is labelled as Reason R. Assertion A: If a proposition P implies proposition Q, then we can say that P is a sufficient condition for Q or P => Q Reason R: For proportion Q to be true it is sufficient that P is true i.e., Q is a necessary condition for P. In the light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Logic and proof techniques has come up 73 times in 3 exams since 2004.
This question is on Necessary and sufficient conditions, part of Logic and proof techniques in Mathematics.
Telling apart what must hold from what is enough to guarantee a result.
TestStop has 2 past-paper questions on this subtopic.
Question from the CUET-PG 2023 Shift 2 paper. Solutions are TestStop's own. Not affiliated with or endorsed by any examination authority.