Step 1 - Compute the lottery's expected value.
EV=62(24)+63(12)+61(48)=8+6+8=22
Step 2 - Compare to the certainty equivalent. Piku is indifferent between this lottery and a certain ₹28. Her certainty equivalent (CE) is therefore 28.
Step 3 - Interpret. Since CE=28>EV=22, Piku requires a certain amount that is actually MORE than the lottery's expected value to give up the gamble — equivalently, she values the risky lottery MORE than its expected monetary value. This is the signature of risk-loving (convex utility) behavior: a risk-averse person would instead have a certainty equivalent BELOW the expected value (they'd accept less than the EV for the safety of certainty), while a risk-neutral person's CE would equal the EV exactly.
Since CE>EV here, Piku displays risk-loving preferences. Therefore the answer is (A) risk lover.
The trap: (B) risk averse
Students sometimes default to 'risk averse' as the more commonly-discussed/intuitive risk attitude in textbooks without carefully comparing the DIRECTION of the CE-vs-EV gap here — the fact that the certain amount (28) is HIGHER than the expected value (22) is the specific, counter-intuitive signal that must be caught to correctly identify risk-loving rather than risk-averse behavior.