Let be a game (player chooses rows ; player chooses columns ), and let be obtained from by giving player an additional column (strategy) , with the payoffs in the and columns unchanged. Then
Tap an option to check your answer.
Let be a game (player chooses rows ; player chooses columns ), and let be obtained from by giving player an additional column (strategy) , with the payoffs in the and columns unchanged. Then
Tap an option to check your answer.
Checking your account…
Let G be a 2× 2 game (player 1 chooses rows U,D; player 2 chooses columns L,R), and let G′ be obtained from G by giving player 2 an additional column (strategy) M, with the payoffs in the L and R columns unchanged. Then (A) 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G′ cannot be less than 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G (B) 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G cannot be less than 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G′ (C) 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G must be equal to 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G′ (D) 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G may be higher than 2 's payoff in a Nash equilibrium of G′
Also written as: Let G be a 2* 2 game (player 1 chooses rows U,D; player 2 chooses columns L,R), and let G' be obtained from G by giving player 2 an additional column (strategy) M, with the payoffs in the L and R columns unchanged. Then
Game theory and strategic behaviour has come up 61 times in 6 exams since 2008.
This question is on Extensive-form games and backward induction, part of Game theory and strategic behaviour in Game Theory.
Games played in sequence, solved from the end back to the start.
TestStop has 16 past-paper questions on this subtopic.
Question from the DSE 2020 paper. Solutions are TestStop's own. Not affiliated with or endorsed by any examination authority.