Suppose we have estimated , where is earnings, is experience, and for females, for males. If we had coded the dummy as for females and for males, the new estimated coefficients (in the same order) would have been
Tap an option to check your answer.
Suppose we have estimated , where is earnings, is experience, and for females, for males. If we had coded the dummy as for females and for males, the new estimated coefficients (in the same order) would have been
Tap an option to check your answer.
Checking your account…
Suppose we have estimated y = 10 + 1.5x + 4D, where y is earnings, x is experience, and D = 0 for females, 1 for males. If we had coded the dummy as -1 for females and 1 for males, the new estimated coefficients (in the same order) would have been (A) 12, 1.5, -2 (B) 12, 1.5, 2 (C) 14, 1.5, -4 (D) 10, 1.5, 4
Dummy variables and functional forms has come up 20 times in 6 exams since 2011.
This question is on Dummy variables and the dummy variable trap, part of Dummy variables and functional forms in Econometrics.
Using 0-1 variables for categories, how to read their coefficients, and the trap of too many.
TestStop has 10 past-paper questions on this subtopic.
Question from the DSE 2018 paper. Solutions are TestStop's own. Not affiliated with or endorsed by any examination authority.